| TOC |
|
By submitting this Internet-Draft, each author represents that any applicable patent or other IPR claims of which he or she is aware have been or will be disclosed, and any of which he or she becomes aware will be disclosed, in accordance with Section 6 of BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as “work in progress.”
The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt.
The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.
This Internet-Draft will expire on September 12, 2008.
This memo defines a Management Information Base (MIB) module for use with network management protocols in the Internet community. In particular, it defines managed objects for the Forwarding and Control Element Separation (ForCES) Network Element (NE).
1.
Requirements notation
2.
The Internet-Standard Management Framework
3.
Introduction
4.
ForCES MIB Overview
5.
ForCES MIB Definition
6.
Associations kept in the MIB
7.
Support for multiple CEs and FEs
8.
Security Considerations
9.
IANA Considerations
10.
Changes from Previous Draft Revisions
11.
References
11.1.
Normative References
11.2.
Informative References
Appendix A.
Acknowledgments
§
Author's Address
§
Intellectual Property and Copyright Statements
| TOC |
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119] (Bradner, S., “Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels,” March 1997.).
| TOC |
For a detailed overview of the documents that describe the current Internet-Standard Management Framework, please refer to section 7 of [RFC3410] (Case, J., Mundy, R., Partain, D., and B. Stewart, “Introduction and Applicability Statements for Internet-Standard Management Framework,” December 2002.).
Managed objects are accessed via a virtual information store, termed the Management Information Base or MIB. MIB objects are generally accessed through the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP). Objects in the MIB are defined using the mechanisms defined in the Structure of Management Information (SMI). This memo specifies a MIB module that is compliant to the SMIv2, which is described in STD 58, [RFC2578] (McCloghrie, K., Ed., Perkins, D., Ed., and J. Schoenwaelder, Ed., “Structure of Management Information Version 2 (SMIv2),” April 1999.), STD 58, [RFC2579] (McCloghrie, K., Ed., Perkins, D., Ed., and J. Schoenwaelder, Ed., “Textual Conventions for SMIv2,” April 1999.) and STD 58, [RFC2580] (McCloghrie, K., Perkins, D., and J. Schoenwaelder, “Conformance Statements for SMIv2,” April 1999.).
| TOC |
The ForCES MIB module is a read-only MIB module that captures information related to the ForCES protocol ([RFC3654] (Khosravi, H. and T. Anderson, “Requirements for Separation of IP Control and Forwarding,” November 2003.), [RFC3746] (Yang, L., Dantu, R., Anderson, T., and R. Gopal, “Forwarding and Control Element Separation (ForCES) Framework,” April 2004.), [forces‑applicability‑draft] (Crouch, A., Khosravi, H., Handley, M., and A. Doria, “ForCES Applicability Statement,” February 2006.) and [forces‑protocol‑draft] (Doria, A., Haas, R., Hadi Salim, J., Khosravi, H., and W. Wang, “ForCES Protocol Specification,” March 2006.)).
The ForCES MIB module does not include information that is specified in other MIB modules, such as packet counters for interfaces, etc.
More specifically, the information in the ForCES MIB module relative to associations that are up includes:
| TOC |
The MIB module contains the latest ForCES protocol version supported by the CE (forcesLatestProtocolVersionSupported). Note that the CE must also allow interaction with FEs supporting earlier versions.
For each association identified by the pair CE ID and FE ID, the following associated information is provided by the MIB module as an entry (forcesAssociationEntry) in the association table (forcesAssociationTable):
Finally, the MIB module defines the following notifications:
| TOC |
FORCES-MIB DEFINITIONS ::= BEGIN
IMPORTS
MODULE-IDENTITY, OBJECT-TYPE, NOTIFICATION-TYPE,
mib-2, Integer32, Counter32
FROM SNMPv2-SMI
TEXTUAL-CONVENTION, TimeStamp
FROM SNMPv2-TC
MODULE-COMPLIANCE, OBJECT-GROUP,
NOTIFICATION-GROUP
FROM SNMPv2-CONF;
forcesMib MODULE-IDENTITY
LAST-UPDATED "200803111200Z" -- Mar 11, 2008
ORGANIZATION "IETF Forwarding and Control Element
Separation (ForCES) Working Group"
CONTACT-INFO
"WG Charter:
http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/forces-charter.html
Mailing lists:
General Discussion: forces@peach.ease.lsoft.com
To Subscribe: listserv@peach.ease.lsoft.com
In Body: subscribe forces
Chairs: Patrick Droz
Email: dro@zurich.ibm.com
David Putzolu
Email: David.Putzolu@intel.com
Editor: Robert Haas
IBM
Email: rha@zurich.ibm.com"
DESCRIPTION
"This MIB module contains managed object definitions
for the ForCES Protocol.
Copyright (C) The IETF Trust (2008). This
version of this MIB module is part of RFC yyyy; see
the RFC itself for full legal notices."
-- RFC Ed.: replace yyyy with actual RFC number & remove this note
REVISION "200803111200Z" -- Mar 11, 2008
DESCRIPTION
"Initial version, published as RFC yyyy."
-- RFC Ed.: replace yyyy with actual RFC number & remove this note
::= { mib-2 XXX }
-- RFC Ed.: replace XXX with IANA-assigned number & remove this note
--****************************************************************
forcesMibNotifications OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { forcesMib 0 }
forcesMibObjects OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { forcesMib 1 }
forcesMibConformance OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { forcesMib 2 }
ForcesID ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The ForCES identifier is a four octet quantity."
SYNTAX OCTET STRING (SIZE (4))
ForcesProtocolVersion ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"ForCES protocol version number.
The version numbers used are defined in the
specifications of the respective protocol:
1 - ForCESv1 [RFCzzzz]."
-- RFC Ed.: replace zzzz with actual RFC number of ForCES protocol
-- & remove this note
SYNTAX Integer32 (1..255)
DISPLAY-HINT "d"
-- Notifications
forcesAssociationEntryUp NOTIFICATION-TYPE
OBJECTS {
forcesAssociationRunningProtocolVersion
}
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"This notification is generated as soon
as an association enters the UP state.
Note that these notifications are not
throttled as the CE itself should
throttle the setup of associations."
::= { forcesMibNotifications 1 }
forcesAssociationEntryDown NOTIFICATION-TYPE
OBJECTS {
forcesAssociationRunningProtocolVersion
}
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"This notification is generated as soon
as an association leaves the UP state.
Note that these notifications are not
throttled as the CE itself should
throttle the setup of associations."
::= { forcesMibNotifications 2 }
forcesAssociationEntryUpStats NOTIFICATION-TYPE
OBJECTS {
forcesAssociationRunningProtocolVersion,
forcesAssociationTimeUp,
forcesAssociationHBMsgSent,
forcesAssociationHBMsgReceived,
forcesAssociationOtherMsgSent,
forcesAssociationOtherMsgReceived
}
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"This notification is generated as soon
as an association enters the UP state.
Note that these notifications are not
throttled as the CE itself should
throttle the setup of associations."
::= { forcesMibNotifications 3 }
forcesAssociationEntryDownStats NOTIFICATION-TYPE
OBJECTS {
forcesAssociationRunningProtocolVersion,
forcesAssociationTimeUp,
forcesAssociationTimeDown,
forcesAssociationHBMsgSent,
forcesAssociationHBMsgReceived,
forcesAssociationOtherMsgSent,
forcesAssociationOtherMsgReceived
}
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"This notification is generated as soon
as an association leaves the UP state.
Note that these notifications are not
throttled as the CE itself should
throttle the setup of associations."
::= { forcesMibNotifications 4 }
-- Objects
forcesLatestProtocolVersionSupported OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX ForcesProtocolVersion
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The ForCES protocol version supported by the CE.
The current protocol version is 1.
Note that the CE must also allow interaction
with FEs supporting earlier versions."
::= { forcesMibObjects 1 }
forcesAssociations OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { forcesMibObjects 2 }
forcesAssociationTable OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF ForcesAssociationEntry
MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The (conceptual) table of associations."
::= { forcesAssociations 1 }
forcesAssociationEntry OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX ForcesAssociationEntry
MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"A (conceptual) entry for one association."
INDEX { forcesAssociationCEID, forcesAssociationFEID }
::= { forcesAssociationTable 1 }
ForcesAssociationEntry ::= SEQUENCE {
forcesAssociationCEID ForcesID,
forcesAssociationFEID ForcesID,
forcesAssociationRunningProtocolVersion
ForcesProtocolVersion,
forcesAssociationTimeUp TimeStamp,
forcesAssociationTimeDown TimeStamp,
forcesAssociationHBMsgSent Counter32,
forcesAssociationHBMsgReceived Counter32,
forcesAssociationOtherMsgSent Counter32,
forcesAssociationOtherMsgReceived Counter32 }
forcesAssociationCEID OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX ForcesID
MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The ForCES ID of the CE."
::= { forcesAssociationEntry 1 }
forcesAssociationFEID OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX ForcesID
MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The ForCES ID of the FE."
::= { forcesAssociationEntry 2 }
forcesAssociationRunningProtocolVersion OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX ForcesProtocolVersion
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The current ForCES protocol version used in this
association.
The current protocol version is 1."
::= { forcesAssociationEntry 3 }
forcesAssociationTimeUp OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX TimeStamp
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The value of sysUpTime at the time this
association entered the UP state.
If this association started prior to the last
initialization of the network subsystem, then
this object contains a zero value.
This object allows to uniquely identify
associations with the same CE and FE IDs."
::= { forcesAssociationEntry 4 }
forcesAssociationTimeDown OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX TimeStamp
MAX-ACCESS accessible-for-notify
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The value of sysUpTime at the time this
association left the UP state."
::= { forcesAssociationEntry 5 }
forcesAssociationHBMsgSent OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Counter32
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"A counter of how many heartbeat messages have
have been sent by the CE on this association
since the association entered the UP state.
If this association started prior to the last
initialization of the network subsystem, then
this object contains the value since the
initialization."
::= { forcesAssociationEntry 6 }
forcesAssociationHBMsgReceived OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Counter32
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"A counter of how many heartbeat messages
have been received by the CE on this association
since the association entered the UP state.
If this association started prior to the last
initialization of the network subsystem, then
this object contains the value since the
initialization."
::= { forcesAssociationEntry 7 }
forcesAssociationOtherMsgSent OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Counter32
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"A counter of how many messages other than
heartbeat (i.e., config and query)
have been sent by the CE on this association
since the association entered the UP state.
If this association started prior to the last
initialization of the network subsystem, then
this object contains the value since the
initialization."
::= { forcesAssociationEntry 8 }
forcesAssociationOtherMsgReceived OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Counter32
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"A counter of how many messages other than
heartbeat (i.e., config response, query response,
event notification, and packet redirect)
have been received by the CE on this association
since the association entered the UP state.
If this association started prior to the last
initialization of the network subsystem, then
this object contains the value since the
initialization."
::= { forcesAssociationEntry 9 }
-- Conformance
forcesMibCompliances OBJECT IDENTIFIER
::= { forcesMibConformance 1 }
forcesMibGroups OBJECT IDENTIFIER
::= { forcesMibConformance 2 }
-- Compliance statements
forcesMibCompliance MODULE-COMPLIANCE
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The compliance statement for routers running ForCES and
implementing the ForCES MIB."
MODULE -- this module
MANDATORY-GROUPS { forcesMibGroup, forcesNotificationGroup }
GROUP forcesNotificationStatsGroup
DESCRIPTION
"Implementation of this group is recommended."
GROUP forcesStatsGroup
DESCRIPTION
"Implementation of this group is recommended."
::= { forcesMibCompliances 1 }
-- Units of conformance
forcesNotificationGroup NOTIFICATION-GROUP
NOTIFICATIONS { forcesAssociationEntryUp,
forcesAssociationEntryDown
}
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"A collection of notifications for signaling important
ForCES events."
::= { forcesMibGroups 1 }
forcesMibGroup OBJECT-GROUP
OBJECTS { forcesLatestProtocolVersionSupported,
forcesAssociationRunningProtocolVersion
}
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"A collection of objects to support management of ForCES
routers."
::= { forcesMibGroups 2 }
forcesNotificationStatsGroup NOTIFICATION-GROUP
NOTIFICATIONS { forcesAssociationEntryUpStats,
forcesAssociationEntryDownStats
}
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"A collection of optional notifications for signaling
important ForCES events including statistics."
::= { forcesMibGroups 3 }
forcesStatsGroup OBJECT-GROUP
OBJECTS { forcesAssociationTimeUp,
forcesAssociationTimeDown,
forcesAssociationHBMsgSent,
forcesAssociationHBMsgReceived,
forcesAssociationOtherMsgSent,
forcesAssociationOtherMsgReceived
}
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"A collection of optional objects to provide extra
information about the associations. There is no protocol
reason to keep such information, but these objects can
be very useful in debugging connectivity problems."
::= { forcesMibGroups 4}
END
| TOC |
Only associations that are UP are reflected in this MIB module. Associations enter the UP state as soon as the CE has sent to the FE an Association Setup Response message containing a successful Association Setup Result.
Associations are removed from the MIB module as soon as they leave the UP state, i.e., if the CE has not received any message (Heartbeat or other protocol message) from the FE within a given time period or if an Association Teardown message has been sent by the CE.
Statistics counters are not initialized to zero when the association is created. Instead, a delta value must be calculated from two successive readings. Note that the optional up and down notifications contain the statistics with the initial and final value of the statistics.
| TOC |
An NE consists of one or more FEs and one or more CEs. Where there is a single CE, that CE will have knowledge of all the associations in the NE and so can provide the information necessary to support the managed objects defined in this MIB module. Where there is more than one CE, information about the associations may be distributed among the CEs. Whether each CE implements the managed objects for the associations of which it is aware or whether the CEs cooperate to present the appearance of a single set of managed objects for all the associations in the NE is outside the scope of this document.
| TOC |
There are no management objects defined in this MIB module that have a MAX-ACCESS clause of read-write and/or read-create. So, if this MIB module is implemented correctly, then there is no risk that an intruder can alter or create any management objects of this MIB module via direct SNMP SET operations.
Some of the readable objects in this MIB module (i.e., objects with a MAX-ACCESS other than not-accessible) may be considered sensitive or vulnerable in some network environments. It is thus important to control even GET and/or NOTIFY access to these objects and possibly to even encrypt the values of these objects when sending them over the network via SNMP. These are the tables and objects and their sensitivity/vulnerability:
SNMP versions prior to SNMPv3 did not include adequate security. Even if the network itself is secure (for example by using IPsec), even then, there is no control as to who on the secure network is allowed to access and GET/SET (read/change/create/delete) the objects in this MIB module.
It is RECOMMENDED that implementers consider the security features as provided by the SNMPv3 framework (see [RFC3410] (Case, J., Mundy, R., Partain, D., and B. Stewart, “Introduction and Applicability Statements for Internet-Standard Management Framework,” December 2002.), section 8), including full support for the SNMPv3 cryptographic mechanisms (for authentication and privacy).
Further, deployment of SNMP versions prior to SNMPv3 is NOT RECOMMENDED. Instead, it is RECOMMENDED to deploy SNMPv3 and to enable cryptographic security. It is then a customer/operator responsibility to ensure that the SNMP entity giving access to an instance of this MIB module is properly configured to give access to the objects only to those principals (users) that have legitimate rights to indeed GET or SET (change/create/delete) them.
| TOC |
The MIB module in this document uses the following IANA-assigned OBJECT IDENTIFIER values recorded in the SMI Numbers registry:
Descriptor OBJECT IDENTIFIER value
---------- -----------------------
forcesMIB { mib-2 XXX }
Editor's Note (to be removed prior to publication): the IANA is requested to assign a value for "XXX" under the 'mib-2' subtree and to record the assignment in the SMI Numbers registry. When the assignment has been made, the RFC Editor is asked to replace "XXX" (here and in the MIB module) with the assigned value and to remove this note.
| TOC |
Editor's Note (to be removed prior to publication): Prior to RFC publication of this document, the RFC Editor is asked to remove this entire section titled "Changes from Previous Draft Versions".
Changes from draft-ietf-forces-mib-05: Copyright statement in the MIB description corrected to IETF Trust.
Changes from draft-ietf-forces-mib-04. They are changes suggested by the MIB doctor review, according to the MIB Review Checklist in Appendix A of RFC 4181:
Changes from draft-ietf-forces-mib-03. They are small fixes to the text and the MIB module:
Changes from draft-ietf-forces-mib-02. They are refinements of the MIB module:
Changes from draft-ietf-forces-mib-01. The changes are in response to the Working Group Last Call:
| TOC |
| TOC |
| TOC |
| [RFC3410] | Case, J., Mundy, R., Partain, D., and B. Stewart, “Introduction and Applicability Statements for Internet-Standard Management Framework,” RFC 3410, December 2002 (TXT). |
| [forces-applicability-draft] | Crouch, A., Khosravi, H., Handley, M., and A. Doria, “ForCES Applicability Statement,” ID Document: draft-ietf-forces-applicability-04.txt, February 2006. |
| TOC |
The author gratefully acknowledges the contributions of: Jinrong Fenggen, John Flick, Xiaoyi Guo, Joel Halpern, Tom Petch, and Jamal Hadi Salim.
| TOC |
| Robert Haas | |
| IBM | |
| Saeumerstrasse 4 | |
| Rueschlikon 8803 | |
| CH | |
| Email: | rha@zurich.ibm.com |
| URI: | http://www.zurich.ibm.com/~rha |
| TOC |
Copyright © The IETF Trust (2008).
This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors retain all their rights.
This document and the information contained herein are provided on an “AS IS” basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY, THE IETF TRUST AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in this document or the extent to which any license under such rights might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has made any independent effort to identify any such rights. Information on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at http://www.ietf.org/ipr.
The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at ietf-ipr@ietf.org.