Network Working Group M.T. Rose
Internet-Draft Invisible Worlds, Inc.
Expires: October 10, 1999 April 11, 1999
Writing I-Ds and RFCs using XML
draft-mrose-writing-rfcs-01
Status of this Memo
This document is an Internet-Draft and is in full conformance
with all provisions of Section 10 of RFC2026.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that
other groups may also distribute working documents as
Internet-Drafts.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six
months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other
documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts
as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in
progress."
The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt
The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.
This Internet-Draft will expire on October 10, 1999.
Abstract
This memo presents a technique for using XML as a source format
for documents in the Internet-Drafts and RFC series.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (1999). All Rights Reserved.
Rose Expires October 10, 1999 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft Writing I-Ds and RFCs using XML April 1999
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2. Using the DTD to Write I-Ds and RFCs . . . . . . . . . . . 4
2.1 XML basics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
2.2 Front matter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
2.2.1 The title Element . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
2.2.2 The author Element . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
2.2.3 The date Element . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
2.2.4 Meta Data Elements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
2.2.5 The abstract Element . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
2.2.6 The note Element . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
2.2.7 Status, Copyright Notice, Table of Contents . . . . . . . 9
2.2.7.1 Conformance with RFC 2026 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
2.2.8 Everything in the Front . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
2.3 The Middle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
2.3.1 The section Element . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
2.3.1.1 The t Element . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
2.3.1.2 The list Element . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
2.3.1.3 The figure Element . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
2.3.1.4 The xref Element . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
2.3.1.5 The eref Element . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
2.3.1.6 The iref Element . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
2.3.1.7 The vspace Element . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
2.4 Back matter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
2.4.1 The references Element . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
2.4.2 Appendices . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
2.4.3 Copyright Status . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
3. Processing the XML Source File . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
3.1 Editing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
3.1.1 Checking . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
3.2 Converting to Text Format . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
3.3 Converting to HTML Format . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
3.4 Viewing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
3.5 Searching . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
4. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
Author's Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
A. The rfc Element . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
B. The RFC DTD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
C. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
D. Revision History . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
Rose Expires October 10, 1999 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft Writing I-Ds and RFCs using XML April 1999
1. Introduction
This memo describes how to write a document for the I-D and RFC
series using the Extensible Markup Language[1] (XML). This memo
has three goals:
1. To describe a simple XML Document Type Definition (DTD) that
is powerful enough to handle the simple formatting
requirements of RFC-like documents whilst allowing for
meaningful markup of descriptive qualities.
2. To describe software that processes XML source files,
including a tool that produces documents conforming to RFC
2223[2], HTML format, and so on.
3. To provide the proof-of-concept for the first two goals (this
memo was written using this DTD and produced using that
software).
It is beyond the scope of this memo to discuss the political
ramifications of using XML as a source format for RFC-like
documents. Rather, it is simply noted that adding minimal markup
to plain text:
o allows the traditional production of textual RFC-like
documents using familiar editors;
o requires some, albeit minimal, additions to existing software
environments; and,
o permits information to be organized, searched, and retrieved
using both unstructured and structured mechanisms.
Rose Expires October 10, 1999 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft Writing I-Ds and RFCs using XML April 1999
2. Using the DTD to Write I-Ds and RFCs
We do not provide a formal or comprehensive description of XML.
Rather, this section discusses just enough XML to use a Document
Type Declaration (DTD) to write RFC-like documents.
If you're already familiar with XML, skip to Appendix B to look
at the DTD.
2.1 XML basics
There are very few rules when writing in XML, as the syntax is
simple. There are five terms you'll need to know:
1. An "element" usually refers to a start tag, an end tag, and
all the characters in between, e.g., "text and/or
nested elements"
2. An "empty element" combines the start tag and the end tag,
e.g., "". You don't find these in HTML.
3. An "attribute" is part of an element. If present, they occur
in the start tag, e.g., "". Of course,
they can also appear in empty elements, e.g., "".
4. An "entity" is a textual macro that starts with "&". Don't
worry about these, you'll only use them whenever you want to
put a "&" or a "<" in your text.
5. A "token" is a string of characters. The first character is
either a letter or an underscore ("_"). Any characters that
follow are either letters, numbers, an underscore, or a
period (".").
First, start your source file with an XML declaration, a
reference to the DTD, and the "rfc" element:
...
Ignore the first two lines -- the declaration and the reference
-- and simply treat them as opaque strings. Nothing else should
be present after the "" tag.
(NOTE TO READER: when this memo is published as an RFC, the
Rose Expires October 10, 1999 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft Writing I-Ds and RFCs using XML April 1999
"XXXX" above will be replaced with the actual string to use in
your source file.)
Second, make sure that all elements are properly matched and
nested. A properly matched element that starts with ""
is eventually followed with "". (Empty elements are
always matched.) Elements are properly nested when they don't
overlap.
For example,
...
...
...
is properly nested.
However,
...
...
...
overlaps, so the elements aren't properly nested.
Third, never use "<" or "&" in your text. Instead, use either
"<" or "&", respectively.
Fourth, there are two quoting characters in XML, 'apostrophe' and
"quotation". Make sure that all attributes values are quoted,
e.g., "", If the value contains one of the
quoting characters, then use the other to quote the value, e.g.,
"", If the value contains both quoting
characters, then use one of them to quote the value, and replace
occurrances of that character in the attribute value with either
''' (apostrophe) or """ (quotation), e.g., "".
Rose Expires October 10, 1999 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft Writing I-Ds and RFCs using XML April 1999
If you want to put a comment in your source file, here's the
syntax:
Finally, XML is case sensitive.
2.2 Front matter
Immediately following the "" tag is the "front" element:
...
(Note that in all examples, indentation is used only for
expository purposes.)
The "front" element consists of a "title" element, one or more
"author" elements, a "date" element, one or more optional "area"
elements, one or more optional "workgroup" elements, one or more
optional "keyword" elements, an optional "abstract" element. and,
one or more optional "note" elements.
Rose Expires October 10, 1999 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft Writing I-Ds and RFCs using XML April 1999
2.2.1 The title Element
The "title" element identifies the title of the document. Because
the title will be used in the headers of the document when
formatted according to [2], if the title is more than 42
characters, then an abbreviation should also be provided, e.g.,
The IETF's Discussion on "Source Format of RFC Documents"
2.2.2 The author Element
Each "author" element identifies a document author. Since a
document may have more than one author, more than one "author"
element may be present. If the author is a person, then three
attributes must be present in the "" tag, "initials",
"surname", and "fullname", e.g.,
The "author" element itself consists of an "organization"
element, and, an optional "address" element.
The "organization" element is similar to the "title" element, in
that an abbreviation may be paired with a long organization name
using the "abbrev" attribute, e.g.,
USC/Information Sciences Institute
The "address" element consists of an optional "postal" element,
an optional "phone" element, an optional "facsimile" element, an
optional "email" element, and, an optional "uri" element.
The "postal" element contains one or more "street" elements,
followed by any combination of "city", "region" (state or
province), "code" (zipcode or postal code), and "country"
elements, e.g.,
950 Charter StreetM/S 40Redwood CityCA94063US
Rose Expires October 10, 1999 [Page 7]
Internet-Draft Writing I-Ds and RFCs using XML April 1999
This flexibility is provided to allow for different national
formats for postal addresses. Note however, that although the
order of the "city", "region", "code", and "country" elements
isn't specified, at most one of each may be present. Regardless,
these elements must not be re-ordered during processing by an XML
application (e.g., display applications must preserve the
ordering of the information contained in these elements).
Finally, the value of the "country" element should be a
two-letter code from ISO 3166.
The "phone", "facsimile", "email", and "uri" elements are simple,
e.g.,
+1 650 779 7081mrose@not.invisible.nethttp://invisible.net/
2.2.3 The date Element
The "date" element identifies the publication date of the
document. It consists of a month and a year, e.g.,
The "date" element also has an optional day attribute.
2.2.4 Meta Data Elements
The "front" element may contain meta data -- the content of these
elements does not appear in printed versions of the document.
A document has one or more optional "area", "workgroup" and
"keyword" elements, e.g.,
General
RFC Beautification Working GroupRFCRequest for CommentsI-DInternet-DraftXMLExtensible Markup Language
The "area" elements identify a general category for the document
(e.g., one of "Applications", "General", "Internet",
"Management", "Operations", "Routing", "Security", "Transport",
or "User"), while the "workgroup" elements identify the IETF
working groups that produced the document, and the "keyword"
elements identify useful search terms.
Rose Expires October 10, 1999 [Page 8]
Internet-Draft Writing I-Ds and RFCs using XML April 1999
2.2.5 The abstract Element
A document may have an "abstract" element, which contains one or
more "t" elements (Section 2.3.1.1). In general, only a single
"t" element is present, e.g.,
This memo presents a technique for using XML as a
source format for documents in the Internet-Drafts and
RFC series.
2.2.6 The note Element
A document may have one or more "note" elements, each of which
contains one or more "t" elements (Section 2.3.1.1). There is a
mandatory "title" attribute. In general, the "note" element
contains text from the IESG, e.g.,
The IESG has something to say.
2.2.7 Status, Copyright Notice, Table of Contents
Note that text relating to the memo's status, copyright notice,
or table of contents is not included in the document's markup --
this is automatically inserted by an XML application when it
produces either a text or HTML version of the document.
2.2.7.1 Conformance with RFC 2026
If an Internet-Draft is being produced, then the "ipr2026"
attribute should be present in the "" tag at the beginning
of the file. The value of the attribute should be one of:
full: indicating that the document is in full conformance with
all the provisions of Section 10 of RFC 2026;
noDerivativeWorks: indicating that the document is in full
conformance with all the provisions of Section 10 of RFC 2026
except that the right to produce derivative works is not
granted; or,
none: indicating that the document is NOT offered in accordance
with Section 10 of RFC 2026, and the author does not provide
the IETF with any rights other than to publish as an
Internet-Draft.
Rose Expires October 10, 1999 [Page 9]
Internet-Draft Writing I-Ds and RFCs using XML April 1999
In the latter case, a copyright notice will not be automatically
inserted during processing by an XML application.
Consult [3] for further details.
Finally, if the Internet-Draft is being submitted to an automated
process, then the "docName" attribute should be present in the
"" tag at the beginning of the file. The value of this
attribute contains the document (not file) name associated with
this Internet-Draft, e.g.,
...
2.2.8 Everything in the Front
So, putting it all together, we have, e.g.,
Writing I-Ds and RFCs using XMLInvisible Worlds, Inc.950 Charter StreetM/S 40Redwood CityCA94063US+1 650 779 7081mrose@not.invisible.nethttp://invisible.net/
General
RFC Beautification Working GroupRFCRequest for CommentsI-DInternet-Draft
Rose Expires October 10, 1999 [Page 10]
Internet-Draft Writing I-Ds and RFCs using XML April 1999
XMLExtensible Markup LanguageThis memo presents a technique for using XML as a
source format for documents in the Internet-Drafts and
RFC series.
2.3 The Middle
The "middle" element contains all the sections of the document
except for the bibliography and appendices:
...
...
The "middle" element consists of one or more "section" elements.
2.3.1 The section Element
Each "section" element contains a section of the document. There
is a mandatory attribute, "title", that identifies the title of
the section. There is also an optional attribute, "anchor", that
is used for cross-referencing with the "xref" element (Section
2.3.1.4), e.g.,
...
Rose Expires October 10, 1999 [Page 11]
Internet-Draft Writing I-Ds and RFCs using XML April 1999
The "section" element is recursive -- each contains any number
and combination of "t", "figure", and "section" elements, e.g.,
...
...
..................
2.3.1.1 The t Element
The "t" element contains any number and combination of
paragraphs, lists, and figures. Paragraphs are simply text. If a
cross-reference is needed to a section, figure, or reference, the
"xref" element (Section 2.3.1.4) is used; similarly, if an
external-reference is needed, the "eref" element (Section
2.3.1.5) is used. Indexing of text is provided by the the "iref"
element (Section 2.3.1.6).
2.3.1.2 The list Element
The "list" element contains one or more items. Each item is a "t"
element, allowing for recursion, e.g.,
The first item.The second item, which contains two bulleted sub-items:
The first sub-item.The second sub-item.
The "list" element has an optional attribute, "style", having the
value "numbers" (for numeric lists), "symbols" (for bulleted
lists), "hanging" (for hanging lists), or, "empty" (for indented
text). If a "list" element is nested, the default value is taken
from its closest parent; otherwise, the default value is "empty".
Rose Expires October 10, 1999 [Page 12]
Internet-Draft Writing I-Ds and RFCs using XML April 1999
When nested within a "hanging list" element, the "t" element has
an optional attribute, "hangText" that specifies the text to be
inserted, e.g.,
indicating that the document is in full
conformance with all the provisions of Section 10 of RFC
2026;indicating that the
document is in full conformance with all the provisions of
Section 10 of RFC 2026 except that the right to produce
derivative works is not granted; or,indicating that the document is NOT
offered in accordance with Section 10 of RFC 2026, and
the author does not provide the IETF with any rights other
than to publish as an Internet-Draft.
2.3.1.3 The figure Element
The "figure" element groups an optional "preamble" element, an
"artwork" element, and an optional "postamble" element together.
The "figure" element also has an optional "anchor" attribute that
is used for cross-referencing with the "xref" element (Section
2.3.1.4). There is also an optional "title" attribute that
identifies the title of the figure.
The "preamble" and "postamble" elements, if present, are simply
text. If a cross-reference is needed to a section, figure, or
reference, the "xref" element (Section 2.3.1.4) is used;
similarly, if an external-reference is needed, the "eref" element
(Section 2.3.1.5) is used. Indexing of text is provided by the
the "iref" element (Section 2.3.1.6).
The "artwork" element, which must be present, contains "ASCII
artwork". Unlike text contained in the "t", "preamble", or
"postamble" elements, both horizontal and vertical whitespace is
significant in the "artwork" element.
Rose Expires October 10, 1999 [Page 13]
Internet-Draft Writing I-Ds and RFCs using XML April 1999
So, putting it all together, we have, e.g.,
So,
putting it all together, we have, e.g.,
ascii artwork goes here...
be sure to use "<" or "&" instead of "<" and "&",
respectively!
which is a very simple example.
which is a very simple example.
If you have artwork with a lot of "<" characters, then there's an
XML trick you can use:
If you have artwork with a lot of "<"
characters, then there's an XML trick you can
use:The "" construct is called
a CDATA block -- everything between the innermost brackets
is left alone by the XML application.
The "" construct is called a CDATA block --
everything between the innermost brackets is left alone by the
XML application.
Because the "figure" element represents a logical grouping of
text and artwork, an XML application producing a text version of
the document should attempt to keep these elements on the same
page. Because RFC 2223[2] allows no more than 69 characters by 49
lines of content on each page, XML applications should be
prepared to prematurely introduce page breaks to allow for better
visual grouping.
2.3.1.4 The xref Element
The "xref" element is used to cross-reference sections, figures,
and references. The mandatory "target" attribute is used to link
Rose Expires October 10, 1999 [Page 14]
Internet-Draft Writing I-Ds and RFCs using XML April 1999
back to the "anchor" attribute of the "section", "figure", and
"reference" elements. The value of the "anchor" and "target"
attributes should be formatted according to the token syntax in
Section 2.1.
If used as an empty element, e.g.,
according to the token syntax in .
then the XML application inserts an appropriate phrase during
processing, such as "Section 2.1" or "XML
Basics".
If used with content, e.g.,
conforming to RFC 2223.
then the XML application inserts an appropriate designation
during processing, such as "RFC 2223[2]" or "RFC 2223". Although the XML application
decides what "an appropriate designation" might be, its choice is
consistent throughout the processing of the document.
2.3.1.5 The eref Element
The "eref" element is used to reference external documents. The
mandatory "target" attribute is a URI[4], e.g.,
Cafe con Leche
Note that while the "target" attribute is always present, the
"eref" element may be empty, e.g.,
and the XML application inserts an appropriate designation during
processing such as "[9]" or "http://invisible.net/".
2.3.1.6 The iref Element
The "iref" element is used to add information to an index. The
mandatory "item" attribute is the primary key the information is
stored under, whilst the optional "subitem" attribute is the
secondary key, e.g.,
Finally, note that the "iref" element is always empty -- it never
Rose Expires October 10, 1999 [Page 15]
Internet-Draft Writing I-Ds and RFCs using XML April 1999
contains any text.
2.3.1.7 The vspace Element
The "vspace" element, which may occur only inside the "t"
element, is used by the author to provide formatting guidance to
the XML application. There is an attribute, "blankLines", that
indicates the number of blank lines that should be inserted. A
physical linebreak is specified by using the default value, "0".
In addition, the "vspace" element can be used to force a new
physical paragraph within a list item, e.g.,
This is list item.
This is part of the same list item,
although when displayed, it appears
as a separate physical paragraph.
An XML application producing a text version of the document
should exercise care when encountering a value for "blankLines"
that causes a pagebreak -- in particular, if a "vspace" element
causes a pagebreak, then no further blank lines should be
inserted. This allows authors to "force" a pagebreak by using an
arbitrarily large value, e.g., "blankLines='100'".
Finally, note that the "vspace" element is always empty -- it
never contains any text.
Rose Expires October 10, 1999 [Page 16]
Internet-Draft Writing I-Ds and RFCs using XML April 1999
2.4 Back matter
Finally, the "back" element is used for references and appendices:
...
The "back" element consists of an optional "references" element,
and, one or more optional "section" elements. The "back" element
itself is optional, if your document doesn't have any references
or appendices, you don't have to include it.
2.4.1 The references Element
The "references" element contains the document's bibliography. It
contains one or more "reference" elements.
Each "reference" element contains a "front" element and one or
more optional "seriesInfo" elements.
We've already discussed the "front" element back in Section 2.2.
The "seriesInfo" element identifies the document series and
number of the reference, e.g., "RFC 2200", "STD 1", and so on.
Rose Expires October 10, 1999 [Page 17]
Internet-Draft Writing I-Ds and RFCs using XML April 1999
The "reference" element has an optional "anchor" attribute that
is used for cross-referencing with the "xref" element (Section
2.3.1.4), e.g.,
Internet Official Protocol Standards
USC/Information Sciences Institute
RFC 2200STD 1
The "reference" element also has an optional "target" attribute
that is used for external references (c.f., Section 2.3.1.5). The
XML application, if producing an HTML version of the document
will use the "target" attribute accordingly; however, if the
"seriesInfo" element starts with the string "RFC " (e.g., "RFC
2223") the XML application should automatically provide an
appropriate default for the "target" attribute (e.g.,
"http://example.com/rfcs/rfc2223.txt").
2.4.2 Appendices
To include appendices after the bibliography, simply add more
"section" elements. (For an example, look at the example at the
beginning of Section 2.4.)
2.4.3 Copyright Status
The copyright status for the document is not included in the
document's markup -- this is automatically inserted by an XML
application that produces either a text or HTML version of the
document.
Rose Expires October 10, 1999 [Page 18]
Internet-Draft Writing I-Ds and RFCs using XML April 1999
3. Processing the XML Source File
This section concerns itself with applications that operate on an
XML source file. A lot of XML tools are available, as are many
lists of XML resources, e.g., Cafe con Leche[5].
There are two kinds of XML tools: validating and non-validating.
Both check that the source file conforms to the rules given in
Section 2.1. However, in addition to making sure that the source
file is well-formed, a validating tool also reads the DTD
referenced by the source file to make sure that they match. There
are a number of both validating and non-validating tools
available.
3.1 Editing
There are several XML editors available. Ideally, you want an
editor that validates. This has two advantages:
o the editor provides guidance in fleshing-out the document
structure; and,
o the editor validates that the source file matches the rules in
the DTD.
There are two major modes in Emacs that support XML: tdtd[6] and
psgml[7]. The latter mode allows you to validate the source file
(by calling an external program). If you visit the source file in
Emacs and the major mode isn't "SGML" or "XML", then usually all
it takes is adding these lines to your ".emacs" file:
(setq auto-mode-alist
(cons (cons "\\.xml$" 'sgml-mode) auto-mode-alist))
and then restarting Emacs. If this doesn't work, try one of the
sources above.
The author uses both sgml-mode in Emacs, and a commercial
validating editor, Clip! version 1.5[8], when editing source
files.
3.1.1 Checking
If your editor doesn't validate, then you should run a program to
validate the source file.
The author uses the AlphaWorks XML parser[9] for this purpose. It
requires that your system have a Java virtual machine. In
addition to Java, there are validating parsers written in C,
Rose Expires October 10, 1999 [Page 19]
Internet-Draft Writing I-Ds and RFCs using XML April 1999
Perl, Python, and Tcl.
3.2 Converting to Text Format
The author has written the xml2rfc tool[10], which reads the
source file and produces both a text and HTML version of the
document. (This memo was produced using the xml2rfc tool.) Note
that xml2rfc isn't a validating tool, so it's a good idea to use
either a validating editor or run a stand-alone validating parser
prior to using the tool.
3.3 Converting to HTML Format
The XML Style Language (XSL) is used to describe transformations
from the source file into some other structured file. So, ideally
you should use an XSL-capable formatter to convert an XML source
file to HTML.
However, as of this writing XSL is still in considerable flux.
(Hence, no reference was included in this memo, as by the time
you read this section, the reference would be outdated.) So, in
the interim, the author uses the xml2rfc tool for this purpose,
even though this tool doesn't provide much flexibility in its
HTML layout.
3.4 Viewing
Browsers that support either XSL or Cascading Style Sheets (CSS)
are able to view the source file directly.
At present, the author doesn't use any of these browsers, instead
converting source files to either text or HTML.
3.5 Searching
As with text editors, any text-oriented search tool (e.g., grep)
can be used on the source file. However, there are search tools
available that understand structured source.
The author uses sgrep version 1.9[11] for this purpose, e.g.
sgrep -g xml 'ELEMENTS("title") not in ELEMENTS("back")' \
writing-rfcs.xml
which extracts the title element from the source file.
Rose Expires October 10, 1999 [Page 20]
Internet-Draft Writing I-Ds and RFCs using XML April 1999
4. Security Considerations
This memo raises no security issues; however, according to [2],
your document should contain a section near the end that
discusses the security considerations of the protocol or
procedures that are the main topic of your document, e.g.,
...
This memo raises no security issues;
however,
according to ,
your document should contain a section near the end
that discusses the security considerations of the
protocol or procedures that are the main topic of your
document.
Rose Expires October 10, 1999 [Page 21]
Internet-Draft Writing I-Ds and RFCs using XML April 1999
References
[1] World Wide Web Consortium, "Extensible Markup Language (XML)
1.0", February 1998.
[2] Postel, J., Reynolds, J., "Instructions to RFC Authors", RFC
2223, October 1997.
[3] Bradner, S.O., "The Internet Standards Process -- Revision
3", RFC 2026, BCP 9, October 1996.
[4] Berners-Lee, T., Fielding, R.T., Masinter, L., "Uniform
Resource Identifiers (URI): Generic Syntax", RFC 2396,
August 1998.
[5] http://metalab.unc.edu/xml/
[6] http://www.mulberrytech.com/tdtd/
[7] http://www.inria.fr/koala/plh/sxml.html
[8] http://www.t2000-usa.com/
[9] http://www.alphaworks.ibm.com/formula/xml/
[10] http://memory.palace.org/authoring/
[11] http://www.cs.helsinki.fi/~jjaakkol/sgrep.html
Author's Address
Marshall T. Rose
Invisible Worlds, Inc.
950 Charter Street
North 40
Redwood City, CA 94063
US
Phone: +1 650 779 7081
EMail: mrose@not.invisible.net
URI: http://invisible.net/
Rose Expires October 10, 1999 [Page 22]
Internet-Draft Writing I-Ds and RFCs using XML April 1999
Appendix A. The rfc Element
The "" tag at the beginning of the file, with only an
"ipr2026" attribute (Section 2.2.7.1), produces an
Internet-Draft. However, when other attributes are added to this
tag by the RFC editor, an RFC is produced, e.g.,
At a minimum, the "number" attribute should be present.
The other attributes are:
o "obsoletes", having a comma-separated list of RFC numbers,
that the document obsoletes;
o "updates", having a comma-separated list of RFC numbers, that
the document updates;
o "category", having one of these values:
1. "std", for a Standards-Track document;
2. "bcp", "for a Best Current Practices document;
3. "exp", for an Experimental Protocol document;
4. "historic", for a historic document; or,
5. "info", the default, for an Informational document.
o "seriesNo", having the corresponding number in the STD (std),
BCP (bcp), or FYI (info) series.
Finally, a special entity, "&rfc.number;", is available. Authors
preparing an RFC should use this entity whenever they want to
reference the number of the RFC within the document itself. In
printed versions of the document, the appropriate substitution
(or "XXXX") will occur.
Rose Expires October 10, 1999 [Page 23]
Internet-Draft Writing I-Ds and RFCs using XML April 1999
Appendix B. The RFC DTD
Rose Expires October 10, 1999 [Page 24]
Internet-Draft Writing I-Ds and RFCs using XML April 1999
Rose Expires October 10, 1999 [Page 27]
Internet-Draft Writing I-Ds and RFCs using XML April 1999
Rose Expires October 10, 1999 [Page 28]
Internet-Draft Writing I-Ds and RFCs using XML April 1999
Appendix C. Acknowledgements
The author gratefully acknowledges the contributions of: Brad
Burdick, Brian Carpenter, Steve Deering, Patrik Faltstrom, Jim
Gettys, Carl Malamud, and, Frank Strauss.
Rose Expires October 10, 1999 [Page 29]
Internet-Draft Writing I-Ds and RFCs using XML April 1999
Appendix D. Revision History
Changes since 00:
clarification: Elements within the the "address" element (Section
2.2.2) should not be re-ordered.
addition: The "docName" attribute (Section 2.2.7.1).
change: The the "figure" element (Section 2.3.1.3) may now nest
within the "t" element.
addition: The "iref" element (Section 2.3.1.6).
Rose Expires October 10, 1999 [Page 30]
Internet-Draft Writing I-Ds and RFCs using XML April 1999
Index
I
indexing
how to 15
Rose Expires October 10, 1999 [Page 31]
Internet-Draft Writing I-Ds and RFCs using XML April 1999
Full Copyright Statement
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (1999). All Rights Reserved.
This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished
to others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise
explain it or assist in its implmentation may be prepared,
copied, published and distributed, in whole or in part, without
restriction of any kind, provided that the above copyright notice
and this paragraph are included on all such copies and derivative
works. However, this document itself may not be modified in any
way, such as by removing the copyright notice or references to
the Internet Society or other Internet organizations, except as
needed for the purpose of developing Internet standards in which
case the procedures for copyrights defined in the Internet
Standards process must be followed, or as required to translate
it into languages other than English.
The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not
be revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns.
This document and the information contained herein is provided on
an "AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET
ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR
IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE
OF THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY
IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR
PURPOSE.
Rose Expires October 10, 1999 [Page 32]